Why Read Plays Response

           I think that Albee brings up a very interesting point in this article. The examples of the conductor and his piece along with the novelist's "sunset" bring Albee's point to light. When one reads a play, everything that that specific playwright put into words is being directly transferred to the reader. Every emotion that the playwright has put into his words brings to life the true feeling of a piece of work. On the other hand, when a play is preformed, a sense of truth and personality can be lost. The work of actors and directors can rob audiences of the emotions that the playwright intended to inspire. As Albee explains in the article, the work of actors and directors can also cause a play to seem greater than the work truly is. In either case, the influence of those involved in a play can cause the original intentions of the playwright to be lost in translation. I do believe, however, that seeing a live play is a unique experience that people should take part in. Although it may not convey the same emotions that the playwright intended, I believe it is important to allow yourself a chance at interpreting emotions through the work of actors and directors. Plays are not novels for a reason, they are meant to be in front of an audience. While I agree that the strongest personal connection to the author comes from reading the text, I still believe that live shows are important in bringing an entire story to life.